|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home | Contact | Links | ||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
News: Work & welfare
Brave new world09 June 2006Doublethink rules in The Contract Regulation Club, argues Braham Dabscheck.
Since the latter part of the 1980s, The Contract Regulation Club has been the dominant force in Australian industrial relations. It has brought about fundamental changes to Australian industrial relations, the most recent manifestation being the 762 page Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (Cth). Membership of the club has ebbed and flowed over the years, with changes in the political cycle and the creation of new regulatory bodies to further its objects. It includes major employer/business organisations, leaders of the Liberal and National parties, federal government bureaucrats, the Office of the Employment Advocate, the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner, New Right 'think tanks', media commentators, law firms, consultants and academics. The modus operandi of The Contract Regulation Club is doublethink. It advocates deregulation of employment contracts, while at one and the same time intervening in their operation and demanding more regulation to ensure that such contracts are 'loaded' in favour of employers.
The Contract Regulation Club has a vision of an industrial relations nirvana, a place where workers fully understand and willingly embrace the leadership and decisions of management in pursuing the needs of the enterprise. For example, Angwin, refers to a technique known as 'managerial leadership' which Encapsulates the approach to enabling employees to align their efforts with the business ... leadership is about creating the circumstances in which all employees of the business are prepared to align their behaviours voluntarily ... CEOs want to raise the capability of their employees and enable them to contribute their best to the business in order to improve the business performance. The problem for The Contract Regulation Club is that institutions such as trade unions, industrial tribunals, courts and governments, especially Labor governments, with their historical connections to unions, have the potential to impede the realisation of this ideal. The Club wants what it regards as negative regulation to be removed and replaced by positive regulation, to enable the achievement of its vision. Unions, industrial tribunals, courts and Labor governments can continue to have a role as long as their actions are supportive of this idealised relationship. If The Contract Regulation Club cannot dominate these others, or bend them to its will, action will be taken to nullify them, if not bring about their destruction. In the case of unions, especially if a Liberal National coalition is in power, legislation can be changed, new regulatory bodies, such as the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner created, and cases can be mounted before industrial tribunals and courts to restrict and restrain their activities and drain them of resources.'Incorrect' or 'unpalatable' decisions of courts can be rectified by legislative changes. In the case of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, its death can be made 'slow and agonising' by relocating many of its functions to other regulatory bodies, such as the Office of the Employment Advocate and the Australian Fair Pay Commission, the latter being a creation of the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices Act 2005 (Cth). This Act, in turn, overcomes the problem of errant state Labor governments doing anything they shouldn't, by abolishing state industrial relations systems. Do you have a view? Send-a-LetterIf you would like to submit any commentary on the material published on this site for publishing in our letters section, please use our feedback form.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2005 The Evatt Foundation Main Quadrangle (A14) URL:http://evatt.org.au/news/393.html
|
 
The Evatt Foundation is a LaborNET site, proudly designed and sponsored by Social Change Online. |
