Evatt Foundation
search
Home | Contact | Links

Join the Evatt Foundation securely online
Donate to the Evatt Foundation securely online
About Us
--   History
  Doc Evatt
  Our Purpose
  Who's Who
  FAQs

News & Events
    Evatt News
  Evatt Events

Subscribe
  evatt e-news
    info

Publications
    Books
  Papers
  Order Form
  Letters
  Archives

Join Evatt
    Join Online
  Request Form
  Download Form
  Donate Online

Contact Evatt
    Send Feedback
  Contact Us
  Web Survey
  Change Details
 
Facebook
--
News: Work & welfare
 
 

How ambitious is WorkChoices?

20 June 2006

Bradon Ellem takes a historical measure.

In July 2005, the Howard government secured control of both houses of parliament when the Senators who had been elected in the coalition's triumph at the federal poll in October 2004 prepared to take their seats. No government had had such parliamentary power for a generation. No prime minister was less likely to throw away the opportunities this presented than John Howard for whom industrial relations 'reform' has been an article of faith throughout a lifetime in politics.


"Does this mean that WorkChoices was a mere continuation of these trends and a corollary of those other policy changes?"


Whereas the deliberations concerning the first national law to regulate industrial relations (the Conciliation and Arbitration Act passed almost exactly 101 years earlier) had consumed the Commonwealth parliament for years, Howard moved quickly. His government's policy was formally outlined in late May 2005 and on 7 December, WorkChoices, as the legislation was now badged, was passed by parliament after a hurried Senate inquiry and with only minor amendments.

Of course, it is the case that, amid a raft of social, economic and legislative changes, many of the structures and processes developed under the legislation of 1904 had been eroded since the late 1980s, beginning with the introduction of the 'two-tier' wage-fixing system. Does this mean that WorkChoices was a mere continuation of these trends and a corollary of those other policy changes? To answer this question, to decide just how far-reaching are the changes in and consequent upon the legislation, is the core task that this commentary sets itself. To do so, it is necessary to explain and contextualise the new Act.

[read more]

[Image: Adapted from Bill Sanders' cartoon representing the efforts of the authorities in Poland to crush the Solidarity labour movement in the 1980s.]


Do you have a view? Send-a-Letter

If you would like to submit any commentary on the material published on this site for publishing in our letters section, please use our feedback form.

Contact Details
Name: Evatt Foundation
Phone: (02) 9385 7137
Email: evatt@unsw.edu.au
WWW: http://evatt.org.au/

Sort News by Date | Subject


© 2001-2005 The Evatt Foundation

Main Quadrangle (A14)
University of Sydney NSW 2006
Tel: +61 2 8090 1170
Fax: +61 2 8090 1171

[Privacy] [Credits]

URL:http://evatt.org.au/news/397.html
Last Modified:Friday, 23-Jun-2006 18:18:36 EST

Social Change Online Workers Online The Evatt FoundationLaborNET

The Evatt Foundation is a LaborNET site, proudly designed and sponsored by Social Change Online.
Please report any site matters to the webkeeper