![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Home | Contact | Links | ||||
|
|
|
News: Work & welfare
Mocking the rule of law25 August 2008Time's up for the ABCC says George Williams.
I have been asked to talk about the coercive and investigatory powers of the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) under the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005. I approach these powers, not as someone who has ever worked in the construction industry, but as a public lawyer whose focus is on the use, and occasional misuse, of public power by Australian institutions since Federation in 1901. Set against this background, the powers conferred on the Commission are exceptional. In fact, they are not just exceptional, they are unwarranted. The Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act states in section 52 that the ABC Commissioner's powers to obtain information etc. are: (1) If the ABC Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that a person: (a) has information or documents relevant to an investigation; or (b) is capable of giving evidence that is relevant to an investigation; the ABC Commissioner may, by written notice given to the person, require the person: (c) to give the information to the ABC Commissioner, or to an assistant, by the time, and in the manner and form, specified in the notice; or (d) to produce the documents to the ABC Commissioner, or to an assistant, by the time, and in the manner, specified in the notice; or (e) to attend before the ABC Commissioner, or an assistant, at the time and place specified in the notice, and answer questions relevant to the investigation.
This power could be used to require a person to:
The provisions can be applied not only to a person suspected of breaching the law, but to:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2005 The Evatt Foundation Main Quadrangle (A14) URL:http://evatt.org.au/news/479.html
|
The Evatt Foundation is a LaborNET site, proudly designed and sponsored by Social Change Online. |